Legislative History and Background on RDCs and APDCs

 Formation of Georgia's Regional Development Centers (RDCs) began in 1957 with the Georgia Planning and Zoning Enabling Act's authorization of Area Planning and Development Commissions (APDCs). Formation of APDCs was gradual, starting with the Coosa Valley Planning Commission, the Atlanta Metropolitan Planning Commission, and the Central Savannah River Planning Commission. By 1969, 18 APDCs had been created.

 APDCs were created at the behest of the local governments and local business communities to provide individual and shared services to these entities and to tap into the Great Society programs of the 1960s for rural communities. Services ranged from local government technical assistance to the administration of state and federal grant and planning programs.

The Georgia Planning Act of 1989 abolished APDCs and replaced them with RDCs having identical boundaries. The need for regional planning was recognized by the state and efforts were undertaken to create a new series of regional centers for this purpose, but it was eventually determined that the APDCs could be modified to serve this additional purpose without creating a new layer of bureaucracy.

While the 1989 Act authorized RDCs to continue administering federal and state grant and planning programs, it specifically provided for RDCs to:

 "develop, promote and assist in establishing coordinated and comprehensive planning in the state, to assist local governments to participate in an orderly process for coordinated and comprehensive planning, to assist local governments to prepare and implement comprehensive plans which will develop and promote the essential public interests of the state and its citizens, and to prepare and implement comprehensive regional plans which will develop and promote the essential public interests of the state and its citizens" (O.C.G.A. § 50-8-30)

The RDC boards are controlled by their local governments' members. RDC boards must contain at least two but no more than five elected or appointed officials from each member county and may, by provision in RDC bylaws, include non-public members. Each RDC board also has a DCA-appointed ex-officio, non-voting member.

 Generally, RDCs are charged with reviewing and commenting on local plans, providing technical assistance, and, if necessary, assisting in mediation or conflict resolution between its member governments. A few RDCs assume full responsibility for preparing and completing local plans. However, there is little if any leverage that RDCs have in making their member governments comply with these plans. Member governments may withdraw from the process if the proposals on regional planning are not to their liking. In the end, these governments control what goes on in their own city or county.

Based on all local plans within its region, the RDCs each prepare and adopt a regional plan based on the Georgia Department of Community Affairs' (DCA) minimum regional planning standards, developed in accordance with O.C.G.A § 50-8-7.1(b). The 14 regional plans (two pairs of RDCs have compiled joint plans) will form the basis for a statewide comprehensive plan that will reflect Georgia's future economic development and growth strategies.

 To date, RDCs have not achieved their primary planning responsibilities as established by DCA, although some are doing much better than others. Many RDCs have fragmented plans at best, and regional planning must be their primary duty, with economic development, program implementation, and assisting local governments secondary. Efforts by the state to force RDCs to perform have caused problems. Because of the unique structure of RDCs, this is where local level, "bottom-up" planning meets state level, "top-down" policy positions. Local control and self-determination will inevitably cause friction when a statewide plan is eventually developed.

Source: http://www2.state.ga.us/Legis/2001_02/senate/research/rdcstudy.htm